Parmenides claimed change was impossible because, existence was a cohesive totality that didn't give room for change.
What did he say would be the implications if it were possible?
According to Parmenides, if he was right it meant that everything was part of a larger whole and that what we called time were constructs of moments pieced together.
Hence, the correct assertion of Parmenides is that change is an illusion.
Learn more about Parmenides at;
https://brainly.com/question/8998398
#SPJ1
